“Thus, I’m not really sure that we would be saving any money,” she admitted.
On top of that, she would lose not just one room but two– because her mother-in-law doesn’t just want a bedroom. Rather, her mother-in-law wants both a bedroom and a living room, which is currently their dining room, all to herself.
She doesn’t think it’s fair to be cut off from that room, either, especially for her pets.
“Who has been forced indoors pretty much full-time, as our house is now in a city,” she vented.
That’s why, given all these reasons, she’s seriously considering changing her mind about her mother-in-law moving in.
However, she’s not sure if going back on their arrangement and not wanting her mother-in-law to live with them anymore would be a really jerky thing to do or not.
Is it understandable why she wants the first few years of her baby’s life to be spent with just her and her husband around? Does it sound like having her mother-in-law move in would actually make things easier or just more difficult? What would you do if you were in her shoes?
You can read the original post on Reddit here.
If true crime defines your free time, this is for you: join Chip Chick’s True Crime Tribe
It Turns Out That Her Boyfriend Is Married, And She Also Suspects He Has A Son