Katharina Buczek
Her mother-in-law, on the other hand, was apparently acting “weird” about her food avoidance and kept insisting that she tried the turkey. Her mother-in-law even removed the bacon in hopes that she would eat it.
But, she was forced to explain numerous times that taking the bacon off did not make a difference since the turkey was already contaminated and would still make her sick.
She thought everything had gone fine otherwise, though, and did not have a second thought about Christmas dinner. Well, that was until after the holiday ended, when her husband dropped a bomb on her.
Apparently, right after they left her in-law’s house, her husband informed her that they were “not impressed” by how “picky” she acted during the meal. Plus, she got accused of insulting her mother-in-law’s cooking by “behaving entitled.”
So now, even though she didn’t think she did anything wrong at all, she has been left wondering if refusing to eat foods that would trigger a bad reaction at Christmas dinner actually made her a jerk or not.
Why do you think her husband took her food when he knew it was basically the only safe thing she could have at her in-law’s house? Can you believe he tried to claim that she was acting entitled when she was just trying to avoid a reaction on Christmas? Should her husband have stood up for her to her in-laws? If you had been in her shoes, how would you have felt in this situation?
You can read the original post on Reddit here.
If true crime defines your free time, this is for you: join Chip Chick’s True Crime Tribe
Researchers Discovered That Etching Grooves Onto N95 Facemasks Helps Prevent The Spread Of Disease
Brownie Truffle Balls Are One Of Her Favorite Recipes To Serve At A Party
